July 25, 2008
Section: Letters
Page: 6

Gore Energy Proposal Would Hurt Consumers

Al Gore's challenge to have America produce 100 percent of its electricity without a single molecule of carbon is actually a ploy for bigger government. Gore's call for higher taxes and government subsidies for alternative energy solutions will come at a huge cost to consumers.

That's the ultimate goal for global warming alarmists — make energy much more expensive so we use less. Gore's own Alliance for Climate Protection estimated a zero-carbon energy plan would cost as much as $3 trillion.

While Gore may believe energy producers should be forced to pick up the tab, we know that businesses don't pay taxes — people do, in the form of lost jobs or higher prices.

A vibrant economy that isn't hamstrung by high taxes and regulations is the best way to develop viable alternative energies.

Gore wants the government to dictate our energy policy.

According to recent polls, nearly two out of three Americans favor expanding nuclear power, and nearly three out of four favor offshore drilling. Gore firmly opposes both solutions. He thinks the government should decide what is good for Americans, rather than Americans deciding for themselves.

The consequences of government-directed energy policies are well known. Remember the gas lines in the 1970s and higher food prices courtesy of subsidized ethanol? We cannot allow these policies to destroy our economy because doing so will destroy the best tool available to us — the free market.

-- Corey R. Lewandowski, State Director, Americans for Prosperity, New Hampshire